Supreme Court's 8-0 decision curtails judicial power in environmental cases, emphasizing agency discretion under NEPA for infrastructure project impacts.

"Courts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a ...

The Trump administration previously asked the Supreme Court to block a temporary restraining order that initially paused the ...

A legal argument that the US Supreme Court used to foil Joe Biden on climate change and student debt now looms as a threat to ...

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Thursday said President Donald Trump likely has the authority to fire ...

Federal agencies do not need to consider "every conceivable environmental consequence" of a federally backed project, the ...

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump likely has the authority to fire independent ...

The justices appear to be trying to avoid a direct conflict with the Trump administration while also blocking certain ...

Readers of this blog will recall our recent discussion concerning the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, in ...

The Trump administration appealed a ruling by a federal trade court invalidating many of the president’s recent tariffs.

Congressional Democrats are pushing to shift the U.S. Marshals Service — which protects federal judges — away from the Trump ...