You're probably not expecting the best meal of your life at Subway, but if you still want a solid sandwich, it's definitely ...

A lawsuit filed against Subway claimed that the company does not use real tuna or fish in their sandwiches. Subway has denied the complaint and says it delivers “100% cooked tuna” to their ...

The ingredients in Subway's tuna are "not tuna and not fish," an attorney for the plaintiffs says. Accessibility statement Skip to main content. Democracy Dies in Darkness. Subscribe Sign in.

Fish fraud is rampant — and Subway’s tuna scandal is just the tip of the iceberg A viral investigation into the content of Subway's "tuna" is a portent of a much larger fish regulatory problem ...

In January 2021, two Subway customers from Alameda County in California sued the sandwich shop claiming that the tuna fish in their sandwich was “anything but tuna” and “various-concoctions ...

Two California women claim Subway's tuna sandwich actually contains not a "scintilla" of the fish -- and that they we're duped by the fast-food joint's claims, a new $5 million lawsuit alleges.

The lab conducted a PCR test to see if Subway’s tuna featured one of five varying tuna species, the New York Times reported, explaining there are 15 species of fish that can be labeled tuna ...

Subway and a plaintiff have agreed to dismiss a lawsuit casting doubt on what its tuna contains. Claims included that the tuna contained no tuna and that it had traces of other animal DNA.

In response to a request from NPR, a Subway spokesperson insisted on the integrity of its fish sandwich, stating, "Subway serves 100% tuna." The Two-Way DNA Tests Find Subway Chicken Only 50 ...

In 2025, Subway's website still has an entire section devoted to answering questions about its tuna salad, which kind of proves the point the company made in its 2023 statement.