The decision lets the Trump administration halt, for now, a program that lets migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela live and work in the U.S. for up to two years.

The administration had asked the court to allow it to end deportation protections for more than 500,000 people facing dire humanitarian crises in their home countries.

The justices lifted a lower-court order that kept humanitarian parole protections in place for more than 500,000 migrants from four countries: Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The court has also allowed the administration to revoke temporary legal status from about 350,000 Venezuelan migrants in another case.

Federal court determined that President Trump doesn't have the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs, dealing a sweeping blow to his main weapon in his trade war.

President Trump may seek to deport hundreds of thousands of immigrants who recently entered the United States under a two-year grant of parole, the Supreme Court decided Friday. Over two dissents, the justices granted an emergency appeal and set aside rulings by judges in Boston who blocked Trump's repeal of the parole policy adopted by the Biden administration.

President Trump wants to end humanitarian parole for Cubans and others that was granted by the Biden administration.

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to suspend a Biden-era humanitarian parole program that allowed half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to temporarily live and work in the United States.

Court rules against Trump's tariff authority under IEEPA, stating Congress holds power to regulate commerce, impacting his 'Liberation Day' tariff plan.

President Trump wants to end humanitarian parole for Cubans and others that was granted by the Biden administration.

The justices appear to be trying to avoid a direct conflict with the Trump administration while also blocking certain presidential actions.

Supreme Court's 8-0 decision curtails judicial power in environmental cases, emphasizing agency discretion under NEPA for infrastructure project impacts.