The ams-OSRAM Group, a global leader in light and sensor technology, and Munck Wilson Mandala, a full-service law firm with ...

Trade secret litigation can be brutal. Many times you have a company going after an ex-employee (and sometimes their new ...

Legal wrangling continued, however, and now the courts have come down with something of a split decision: Ironmace did not commit copyright infringement but did infringe on Nexon's trade secrets.

Xuelan Yue of Liu Shen & Associates draws on several ‘model cases’ put forward by the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court of China to highlight trends in trade secret ...

Ironmace was original sued by Nexon for infringing on its copyrights and trade secrets with use of materials in Dark and Darker. While Ironmace was able to argue away the copyright infringement ...

A South Korean court has ruled that Ironmace must pay Nexon 8.5 billion won - around $5.87 million USD - in damages over trade secret infringement. Several developers at Ironmace, including CEO ...

Samsara has alleged patent infringement by Motive in an ITC complaint ... Meanwhile, Samsara on Nov. 12 filed a separate trade secrets lawsuit against Motive in California Superior Court for ...

Shein accused Temu—owned by PDD Holdings—of orchestrating a “coordinated scheme” of trade secret theft, counterfeiting, trademark and copyright infringement and false advertising.

The Shein complaint about Temu kicks off with a bang, accusing Temu of being “an unlawful enterprise built on counterfeiting, theft of trade secrets, infringement of intellectual property rights ...