The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add ...

Newspapers have offered puzzles in some capacity for as long as anyone can remember, with crosswords being the most renowned.

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it’s not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...

Wikipedia pauses its AI summary experiment after editor backlash, citing concerns over accuracy, misinformation, and loss of ...

Wikipedia has paused its AI-generated summaries trial after editors warned it threatens accuracy and trust, echoing concerns ...

Browser extensions often make browsing easier by blocking ads, autofilling passwords, or providing productivity tools, but they also pose one of the most overlooked security risks in today’s digital ...

“With Simple Article Summaries, you propose giving one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV issues a platform at the very top of any given article, whilst giving zero editorial control to ...

The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years -- and it's not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...