Baby Groot isn't essential to the set — despite his name being in the title — but he is a nice addition. (Image credit: Future) We can't even complain too much about the stickers used in Lego ...

This particular Venomized Groot, the MCU Baby Groot, ... though it lacks either a Venom logo or the movie-style white veins, which would probably just have bene achieved by sticker anyway.

To my mind, Baby Groot is the worst of it — a joke that consists of pointing at something you know is cute and saying, “You were right! That is cute!” That’s not flattering, it’s cynical.

I Am Groot Deal. $30 ($55)See at Amazon-- $30 ($55); See at Target-- $30 ($55); So what's so great about this Baby Groot figure? Beyond the fact that he looks just like the real Marvel deal--but ...

Baby Groot was arguably one of the most memorable (and GIFed) parts of the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie. So of course, it makes total sense to bring him back for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2.

During the end credits, one of Groot’s twigs is regrown as a sapling, leading to a common theory that the Baby Groot of Vol 2 is actually a younger, respawned version of the original Groot.

Baby Groot was "born" at the end of the first "Guardians of the Galaxy" film, and the extraterrestrial, treelike creature is a tiny, scene-stealing superhero in "Vol. 2." ...

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 director James Gunn has revealed why it was crucial Groot remain a baby in the film. Gunn published a lengthy post on Facebook explaining that the decision to make ...

Due to split-studio rights, this version of Groot probably won’t show up on I Am Groot any time soon. This particular Venomized Groot, which is to say a Venomized version of the MCU Baby Groot ...