In leaping to defend the Trump Administration, the Court conveniently ignored a long-established precedent that prevented Presidents from firing independent-agency heads at will.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller criticized CNN’s Pamela Brown for making "lazy assumptions" about Trump’s executive power on Friday’s "Situation Room."

The justices appear to be trying to avoid a direct conflict with the Trump administration while also blocking certain presidential actions.

A U.S. appeals court on Friday refused to allow President Donald Trump's administration to carry out mass layoffs of federal workers and a restructuring of agencies, leaving a lower court order in place that blocked the sweeping government overhaul.

The Supreme Court ruled for Trump’s removal of two Democratic appointees from federal boards, upholding/discarding limits on the president’s power to fire agency officials.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a scathing disssent, called out the rest of the court for allowing Trump’s harmful executive order to stand.

The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court after a federal judge in Boston blocked the administration’s push to end the program.

A carve-out in last week’s SCOTUS emergency decision on agency official firings “poses a puzzle,” because the central bank’s independence rests on the same foundations as other federal agencies, a dissenting justice wrote.

The Supreme Court on Thursday gave Trump a green light, for now, to his removal of the heads of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board.

On May 22, 2025, the Supreme Court granted President Trump’s emergency application to stay the D.C. Circuit Court order that reinstated National

The Supreme Court is turning to the final weeks of a busy term that started off with blockbuster appeals over transgender rights and TikTok but that has increasingly become wrapped up in the policies and politics of President Donald Trump.