Justices allowed the Trump administration to strip temporary protections from hundreds of thousands of migrants.

The Supreme Court on Friday morning cleared the way for the Trump administration to revoke the Biden administration’s grant of parole – that is, permission to stay in the United […]

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging Assam's deportation policy, which allegedly detains and deports individuals without nationality verification or legal remedies. Filed by the All BTC Minority Students Union,

It’s crunch time for the Supreme Court. By early July, the justices are expected to wrap up their current term, which means that dozens of rulings will be released over the next five weeks. Among the cases yet to be resolved are high-profile battles over medical treatment for transgender children,

Facing legal roadblocks, the Trump administration has pleaded with the Supreme Court for help frequently since the start of Donald Trump's second term.

The Supreme Court’s docket this term includes many of the complex issues American society is currently facing, including: immigration, free speech, religious liberty, LGBTQ rights and voting rights.

"We are but one indivisible nation." State Supreme Court advances major legal challenge over long-running public damage: 'This lawsuit is based on a fundamental legal principle' first appeared on The Cool Down.

The justices appear to be trying to avoid a direct conflict with the Trump administration while also blocking certain presidential actions.

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court alleging that the Assam government has launched a "sweeping and indiscriminate drive" to detain and deport people suspected to be foreigners without proper verification of their nationality or exhausting legal remedies.

The Supreme Court reserved interim orders on pivotal issues related to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Key debates focused on denotifying properties as waqf, composition of waqf boards, and handling waqf on tribal land.

A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday rejected arguments by several Massachusetts cannabis businesses that the federal prohibition on marijuana could no longer be deemed constitutional, as the U.S. Supreme Court held two decades ago.