The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add ...

Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it’s pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated ...

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

Newspapers have offered puzzles in some capacity for as long as anyone can remember, with crosswords being the most renowned.

Wikipedia pauses its AI summary experiment after editor backlash, citing concerns over accuracy, misinformation, and loss of ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

Wikipedia has paused the use of artificial intelligence to generate article summaries on its platform after facing criticism from editors.

The nonprofit behind Wikipedia on Wednesday revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it’s not replacing the Wikipedia community of editors and volunteers with artificial ...

“With Simple Article Summaries, you propose giving one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV issues a platform at the very top of any given article, whilst giving zero editorial control to ...