Biden says Equal Rights Amendment is considered ratified, declaring it ‘the law of the land’
Speaking to the Conference of Mayors Friday, President Joe Biden said the Equal Rights Amendment should be considered a ...
justthenews1h
President Biden says ERA should be considered ratified part of Constitution
The archivist and deputy archivist of the United States said in December that it cannot codify the 1970s Equal Rights Amendment because the deadline for ratification passed without enough votes.
No, Biden Can’t Change the Constitution
Joe Biden is doing all of those things—and also trying to change the Constitution on his way out the door. This morning, ...
Biden affirms Equal Rights Amendment is part of Constitution
President Joe Biden on Friday asserted that the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of ...
New York Magazine2h
Biden Says ERA Is Ratified, But Supreme Court Gets Final Say
The outgoing president’s move is mostly symbolic, but he has given the push for the 28th Amendment some new momentum.
Biden declares Equal Rights Amendment is the ‘law of the land’; it’s not that simple
In keeping with my oath and duty to Constitution and country, I affirm what I believe and what three-fourths of the states ...
Biden declares Equal Rights Amendment US law, even though it is not
U.S. President Joe Biden called the Equal Rights Amendment "the law of the land," on Friday, backing an effort to enshrine the change into the U.S. Constitution even though it long ago failed to ...
Biden says the Equal Rights Amendment should be considered ratified
The president’s statement, coming days before he is replaced by Republican Donald Trump, will probably not have any impact.
Biden says the Equal Rights Amendment is ‘the law of the land.’ What is it, and what happens next?
President Joe Biden’s declaration the Equal Rights Amendment is “the law of the land” likely only sets up more debates for ...
Biden says the Equal Rights Amendment is law. What happens next is unclear
To come into effect, the constitutional amendment would need to be formally published or certified by the National Archivist who has declined to do so in the past. What happens now is unclear.