The cost-effectiveness plane plots bootstrapped cost/effect pairs on a graph where the x-axis represents the difference in effect between 2 therapies and the y-axis represents the difference in cost.

† Effects of varying base-case estimates on the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio of treating all patients with advanced renal insufficiency with an ACE inhibitor versus no ACE inhibitor ...

In the gemifloxacin group, 5 (2.34%) of the 214 patients were hospitalized at least once versus 14 (6.25%) of the 224 patients in the clarithromycin group. The treatment difference in favor of ...

Identification of interventions that are both cost saving and improve clinical outcomes is rare.4 One visual presentation of cost-effectiveness analyses is the incremental cost-effectiveness plane ...

Comparing cost effectiveness ratios for physiotherapy and combination treatment, no significant differences were identified. On the cost effectiveness plane (fig 2), cost-effect pairs are equally ...

Results Along with a 38% reduction in injury risk (rate difference=−1.27/1000 player hours (95% CI −0.33 to −2.2)), healthcare costs were reduced by 43% in the NMT group (−$689/1000 player hours (95% ...