The Supreme Court was surely correct in its recent majority decision acknowledging President Trump acted within his authority ...

The Supreme Court last week reshaped how the federal government thinks about fossil fuel infrastructure. While environmental ...

Supreme Court's 8-0 decision curtails judicial power in environmental cases, emphasizing agency discretion under NEPA for ...

In an emergency filing, the Justice Department said the court should lift a federal judge's order pausing mass federal ...

"Courts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a ...

Since 1998, the Chemical Safety Board has played a key role in probing the causes of major chemical accidents.

Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the authority of judges to block infrastructure ... ‘under the guise of judicial review’ of agency compliance with NEPA, to delay or block agency projects ...

On May 29, 2025, in a 8-0 ruling (Justice Gorsuch recused himself from the case), the Supreme Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

In response to specific problems or issues requiring oversight and regulation by impartial individuals with specialized ...

The decision emphasizes the importance of judicial deference to agencies on NEPA and narrows the scope of environmental analyses.

Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the court’s ruling as a “disastrous decision” ...