The Supreme Court was surely correct in its recent majority decision acknowledging President Trump acted within his authority ...

The Supreme Court last week reshaped how the federal government thinks about fossil fuel infrastructure. While environmental ...

Supreme Court's 8-0 decision curtails judicial power in environmental cases, emphasizing agency discretion under NEPA for ...

In an emergency filing, the Justice Department said the court should lift a federal judge's order pausing mass federal ...

"Courts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a ...

Since 1998, the Chemical Safety Board has played a key role in probing the causes of major chemical accidents.

The court’s action essentially extended an order Chief Justice John Roberts issued in April that had the effect of removing ...

The decision is the latest in which the court’s conservative majority sided with the president’s power to fire agency ...

Congressional Democrats are pushing to shift the U.S. Marshals Service — which protects federal judges — away from the Trump ...

An appeals court previously ruled that a key 1935 precedent, long in the cross hairs of the conservative legal movement, ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the authority of judges to block infrastructure ... ‘under the guise of judicial review’ of agency compliance with NEPA, to delay or block agency projects ...

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of President Donald Trump's firing of two Democratic board members of independent ...