News
We are on the cusp of losing the integrity of one of the most significant environmental acts ever enacted in the United States. Why should this matter? As the Pulitzer Prize-winning evolutionary ...
Three hundred and fifty scientists, 25 law professors and 131 conservation and community organizations spoke out today against a Trump administration proposal intended to weaken habitat protections ...
On March 1, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Immediate Expansion of American Timber Production.” The ...
The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are looking to repeal the definition of ...
5d
The Daily World on MSNEnvironmentalists worry changes to ESA will hurt more wildlife than the spotted owlThe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are looking to repeal the definition of the word “harm,” which specifies protections under the act. While it ...
Citing high costs, a decades-long timeframe, lack of implementation capacity and needless environmental damage, the Center for Biological Diversity today urged the U.S. Forest Service to immediately ...
The Trump administration wants to change the Endangered Species Act's definition of 'harm' in a way that leaves out habitat ...
A total of $4 million was allocated to dozens of wildlife-related projects at the annual Utah Species Protection Account ...
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are looking to repeal the definition ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results