Can Courts Interfere In Disputes Over Properties Of Ex Princely States? Top Court To Examine Article 363 bars the interference of courts in any disputes which may arise from certain treaties ...

Supreme Court to review whether Article 363 bars court involvement in property disputes related to erstwhile princely states. Jaipur royal family's plea against Rajasthan HC ruling.

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether Article 363 of the Constitution bars courts from hearing disputes relating to properties of erstwhile princely states mentioned under the pre ...

By a Court Decision Major Carlisle of Alabama Gains Possession of a Princely Estate. Share full article. April 24, 1897.

In rejecting the “princely sum” sought by Plaintiffs’ counsel, Judge Brown noted that in assessing the reasonableness of fee applications in class actions, courts must “act as a fiduciary ...

NEW DELHI: Rulers of princely states were 'Maharajas' (kings) without 'praja' (subjects), sovereignty and territory after the merger of states with the Indian U ...

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether Article 363 of the Constitution bars courts from hearing disputes relating to properties of erstwhile princely states mentioned under the pre ...

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether Article 363 of the Constitution bars courts from hearing disputes relating to properties of erstwhile princely states mentioned under the pre ...

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine whether Article 363 of the Constitution bars courts from hearing disputes relating to properties of erstwhile princely states mentioned under the ...