News

Point Overlooked in Trial; Journal of Commerce. This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996.
The case was first brought to trial in 1847, but was thrown out because of hearsay evidence. During a second trial in 1850, Dred Scott and his wife sued for, and were granted, their freedom.
Dred Scott first went to trial to sue for his freedom in 1847. Ten years later, after a decade of appeals and court reversals, his case was finally brought before the United States Supreme Court.
2,409 Views Program ID: 327711-1 Category: C-SPAN Specials Format: Call-In Location: Washington, District of Columbia, United States ...
The US Supreme Court building stands in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2022. - The Supreme Court begins their new term today, and is expected to hear cases addressing a number of issues, including ...
As far as the Republican organization’s attempt to evoke the Dred Scott decision in its attempt to delegitimize Harris’ eligibility for president, Dr. Mary Frances Berry, a professor emerita ...
Dred Scott is wrong because U.S. citizenship, properly understood, does not turn upon the consent of the polity to citizenship at all but on birth in U.S. territory and obligation to follow U.S. ...
History shows it’s the justices themselves who are most prone to leaking, perhaps the most famous instance of which involved the infamous Dred Scott decision in 1857. Tim Rowland ...
In St. Louis, a descendant of Dred and Harriet Scott, the couple of the famous Dred Scott decision, is shedding light on her family's story.
Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man, along with his wife Harriet, famously sued for their freedom and that of their two daughters in the landmark Dred Scott v.
Dred Scott first went to trial to sue for his freedom in 1847. Ten years later, after a decade of appeals and court reversals, his case was finally brought before the United States Supreme Court.
No, the 1857 Dred Scott case does not make Kamala Harris ineligible for president “We should all be embarrassed by the existence of anyone reaching back to the history of slavery and coming up ...