News

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.
The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...
The majority of comments reviewed by The Post were positive, though some visitors complained that there were too many ...
AI compute demand doubles every 3.4 months. Current growth trajectories require 10x capacity by 2027. Centralized providers ...
According to a report from Axios, the Trump administration has canceled funding and contracts to Springer Nature, including ...
Wikipedia has paused its AI-generated summaries trial after editors warned it threatens accuracy and trust, echoing concerns ...
Wikipedia pauses its AI summary experiment after editor backlash, citing concerns over accuracy, misinformation, and loss of ...
According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...
- Faster than your laptop dying on 2% power, Wikipedia's AI experiment crashed and burned spectacularly. What's next for ...
Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.
Newspapers have offered puzzles in some capacity for as long as anyone can remember, with crosswords being the most renowned.